English Standar Kompetensi, Kompetensi Dasar, & Ujian Nasional of SMA in Revised Bloom`s Taxonomy


Abstract


Abstract: This study was conducted to investigate the coverage of Revised Bloom’s taxonomy in the English Standar Kompetensi (SK), Kompetensi Dasar (KD) and the English test items of Ujian Nasional for SMA. Content analysis method was chosen as the research design for this study. The writer analyzed the data by categorizing the verbs and the nouns of the data in relation to the categories and dimension of Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. The results of this study revealed that 53% of SKs and KDs cover Understand category and the rest cover Analyze category. All of the SKs and KDs cover conceptual knowledge and other knowledge dimensions are not covered. Moreover, the coverage of Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy in English test items of Ujian Nasional for SMA is not aligned with the coverage of Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy in English SK and KD. The SKs and KDs only cover Remember, Understand, Apply and Analyze categories while the test items were associated with Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, and Evaluate categories. More than 90% of English test items of Ujian Nasional for SMA only covered low order of cognitive categories (Remember, Understand, and Apply). Most of the test items covered factual knowledge and the rest of them covered conceptual knowledge and none of them covered procedural and metacognitive knowledge. 


Keywords


revised Bloom`s taxonomy, national exam, English test item

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, et. al. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York , NY: Longman

Ayvaci and Turkdogan (2010). Analysing “Science and Technology Course Exam Questions” According to Revised Bloom Taxonomy. Retrieved from http://www.tused.org/internet/tused/sayilar/defaultarchive.asp?islem=git2&id=184

Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives - Handbook 1. Cognitive domain. London: Longman.

Brown, H. Douglas. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education Inc.

Brown, James Dean. (1996). Testing in language programs. Upper Saddle River. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents

BSNP. 2010. Ujian NasionalTahun Pelajaran 2009/2010 Bahasa Inggris SMA/MA (A). Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional

BSNP. 2009. Ujian NasionalTahun Pelajaran 2008/2009 Bahasa Inggris SMA/MA (A). Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional

Boyd, Nicola. (2009). A Creative Writing Research Methodology. Taken from “Griffith University”Burns, Robert B. Introduction to Research Methods. Malaysia: Pearson Education Australia

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (Edisi Ketiga). (2001) Jakarta: Balai Pustaka

Fraenkel, Jack. R and Wallen, Norman. E. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research Education. New York: Mc.Graw-Hill

Genesee, Fred and Upshur, John A. (1996). Classroom-based Evaluation in Second Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haryanti (2006) Analisis Soal Soal Biologi Kelas VII SMP Semester Gasal Pada Buku Pegangan Guru Se-Kabupaten Pati. Retrived from http://digilib.unnes.ac.id/gsdl/collect/skripsi/archives/HASHc02f.dir/doc.pdf

Hughes, Arthur. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Second Edition. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press

Krippendorf, Klaus. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. New York: Sage Publications

Nunan, David. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tileston, Donna Walker. (2004). What Every Teacher Should Know About Student Assessment. California : Corwin Press




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v2i2.133

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Script Journal Indexed By

 

 

 

 

SCRIPT JOURNAL is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License

Flag Counter

real
time web analytics