Oral Presentation Performance, Self-Regulated Strategies and Perceived Challenges Among EFL Undergraduate Students in Samarinda

Authors

  • Rika Anggraini Mulawarman University
  • Ventje Jany Kalukar Mulawarman University
  • Weningtyas Parama Iswari Mulawarman University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24903/bej.v7i2.2139

Keywords:

Oral presentation performance, Perceived challenges, Self-regulated strategies, EFL undergraduate students, English Education, Samarinda

Abstract

Limited research exists on oral presentation performance among EFL undergraduate students in Indonesian contexts, particularly regarding self-regulated strategies and perceived challenges. This study addresses the gap by examining presentation experiences across multiple institutions in Samarinda. This qualitative case study involved six sixth-semester students from English Education Departments at three universities: Mulawarman University, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur, and Universitas Widya Gama Mahakam during 2022/2023. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis using purposive sampling. Miles and Huberman's analytical flow model was employed to identify patterns. Students demonstrated good presentation performance in content organization and visual aid utilization. Three challenge categories emerged: linguistic difficulties (grammar accuracy and vocabulary limitations), psychological barriers (presentation anxiety and confidence issues), and technical challenges (time management and organization). Cross-institutional analysis revealed distinct approaches: Mulawarman emphasized formal preparation, Widya Gama favored interactive methods, while UMKT focused on technology integration. Students employed effective self-regulated strategies including systematic practice with peer feedback, self-recording, anxiety management through breathing exercises, and structured organization using templates. Regular practice, thorough preparation, and appropriate anxiety management significantly improved performance outcomes. Findings support Krashen's Affective Filter Hypothesis and Oxford's language learning strategies. Pedagogical implications include incorporating anxiety management training, structured practice opportunities, technology integration, and differentiated instruction. This study uniquely examines cross-institutional differences in EFL presentation approaches within Indonesian university contexts, providing comprehensive insights into self-regulated strategies and perceived challenges specific to Samarinda's educational environment

References

Al Hosni, S. (2014). Speaking Difficulties Encountered by Young EFL Learners. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 2(6), 22–30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270340628_Speaking_Difficulties_Encountered_by_Young_EFL_Learners

Al-Alawneh, M. K., Hawamleh, M. S., Al-Jamal, D. A. H., & Sasa, G. S. (2019). Communication skills in practice. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(6), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.18.6.1

Alwi, N. F. B., & Sidhu, G. K. (2013). Oral Presentation: Self-perceived Competence and Actual Performance among UiTM Business Faculty Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2013.07.070

Amin, M., Abdullah, A., Harun, N., & Karim, A. (2014). Information Seeking Anxiety: Concept, Measurement and Preliminary Research. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 12(1), 47–64. http://ijism.ricest.ac.ir/index.php/ijism/article/view/283

Giles, H. (2016). Communication Accommodation Theory. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.WBIECT056

Hafiz, muhammad ichsan al, & gushendra, rizky. (2021). The Correlation between Students’ Willingness to Communicate and Their Speaking Performance at the Tenth Grade of MAN 1 Pekanbaru. Indonesian Journal of Integrated English Language Teaching, 7(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.24014/IJIELT.V7I1.13772

Kashinathan, S., & Abdul Aziz, A. (2022). TOP: Fostering ESL Students’ Overall Speaking Performance Using Topical-Based Oral Presentation. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/V11-I2/13888

Leong, L.-M., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2017). An Analysis of Factors Influencing Learners’ English Speaking Skill. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ijree.2.1.34

Mhlongo, S., Mbatha, K., Ramatsetse, B., & Dlamini, R. (2023). Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review. Heliyon, 9(6), e16348. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E16348

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook. Sage.

Phoeun, M., & Sengsri, S. (2021). The effect of a flipped classroom with communicative language teaching approach on undergraduate students’ English speaking ability. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14360a

Putra, A. S. (2017). Channing : Journal of English Language Education and Literature, Vol. II No. 1 2017. Journal of English Language Education and Literature, II(1).

Riasari, E., & Makassar, U. N. (2021). An Analysis on Speech Styles Used by English Lecturers. Celebes Journal of Language Studies, 1(2), 2776–7493.

Robillos, R. J. (2022). Impact of LoiLooNote Digital Mapping on University Students’ Oral Presentation Skills and Critical Thinking Dispositions. 15(2), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15228a

Sadiku, L. M. (2015). The Importance of Four Skills Reading, Speaking, Writing, Listening in a Lesson Hour. European Journal of Language and Literature, 1(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.26417/EJLS.V1I1.P29-31

Sahan, A., Abi, B. K., Wisrance, M. W., & Seran, Y. (2022). Exploring Oral Presentation Performance: Level of Mastery and Common Problems of EFL Students from Selected University. REiLA : Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 4(3), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.31849/REILA.V4I3.9212

Tareen, H., & University, K. (2022). Investigating EFL Learners’ Perceptions towards the Difficulties in Oral Presentation at Kandahar University. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 11, 535–535. https://doi.org/10.19044/esipreprint.11.2022.p535

Taylor, R., & Thomas-Gregory, A. (2015). Case Study Research. Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987). https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.29.41.36.e8856

Wael, A., Asnur, M. N. A., & Ibrahim, I. (2018). Exploring students’ learning strategies in speaking performance. International Journal of Language Education, 2(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.26858/IJOLE.V2I1.5238

Yaniafari, R. P., & Rihardini, A. A. (2021). FACE-TO-FACE OR ONLINE SPEAKING PRACTICE: A COMPARISON OF STUDENTS’ FOREIGN LANGUAGE CLASSROOM ANXIETY LEVEL. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies). https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v8i1.3058

Živković, S. (2014). The Importance Of Oral Presentations For University Students. Print) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences MCSER Publishing, 5, 2039–2117. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n19p468

Downloads

Published

2025-07-28

How to Cite

Anggraini, R., Jany Kalukar, V., & Parama Iswari, W. (2025). Oral Presentation Performance, Self-Regulated Strategies and Perceived Challenges Among EFL Undergraduate Students in Samarinda. Borneo Educational Journal (Borju), 7(2), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.24903/bej.v7i2.2139

Issue

Section

Articles