Interactional Meaning-Making in Classroom Discourse: A Conversation Analytical Study of Islamic Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v11i2.2482Keywords:
Interactional meaning-making, classroom discourse, Conversation Analysis, Islamic education, IRF sequences, repairAbstract
Background:This research uses conversation analysis (CA) to explore interactional meaning-making in Islamic education classrooms, defining learning as an interactional and social achievement rather than knowledge transmission. This study identifies sequential discourse organization, examines IRF sequences during conceptual difficulties, investigates repair practices, and analyzes student participation.
Methodology:This qualitative CA study analyzed four audio-recorded classroom sessions at a state Islamic junior secondary school in Manado, Indonesia, involving three teachers across Fiqh, Qur’an–Hadith, and Aqidah Akhlak. The transcribed corpus comprised approximately 80 minutes of interaction across Grade IX and X, conducted primarily in Bahasa Indonesia, including question–answer sequences, discussions, and student presentations.
Findings:Classroom discourse was generally organized through Initiation-Response-Feedback (IRF) sequences functioning as a consistent participation framework. Sequences extended through requests for clarification, reformulation, and contrastive questions when students hesitated or showed partial understanding. Repair practices, initiated by teachers or performed independently by students, served as a key mechanism for minimizing misunderstanding and aligning epistemic perspectives. Student contributions expanded locally following teacher prompts without implying general development of interactional competence.
Conclusion:These findings support meaning-making as an interactional accomplishment mediated through Bahasa Indonesia in subject-matter classrooms, with implications for interactional competence and academic oral literacy-focused discourse-based pedagogy.
Originality:Few Conversation Analysis studies have examined subject-matter classrooms in Islamic education, where religious content is negotiated in a turn-by-turn manner. Specifically, how third-turn design calibrates doctrinal precision, how repair trajectories unfold when the trouble source is doctrinal rather than linguistic, and how textual authority (Qur’an, Hadith) warrants expanded participation remain unaddressed. This study addresses that this gap by showing how IRF, repair, and participation operate when the object of talk is religious rather than general curricular knowledge.
References
Aleksius, M. (2021). Repair practice in the classroom conversations of Indonesian EFL students. Journal of Language and Education, 7(2), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.17323/JLE.2021.11486
Aporbo, R. J., Barabag, J. M. C., Catig, B. U., & Claveria, C. M. P. (2024). Face-threatening and face-saving speech acts of teachers: A discourse analysis of classroom interactions. World Journal of English Language, 14(3), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n3p413
Ariska, R., Rosyid, O. A., & Puspitasari, D. (2024). Classroom interaction using IRF pattern carried out by lecturer in English classrooms: A discourse analysis. Journal of English Language Learning, 8(1), 479–490.
Atar, C., & Seedhouse, P. (2024). Classroom interaction in an online context: A translanguaging-informed conversation analysis perspective. International Journal of Educational Development, 105, 102970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102970
Balaman, U. (2025). A longitudinal case study of L2 interactional competence development in the ELT classroom: Teachability and learnability of L2 interactional practices. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12765
Batlle Rodríguez, J., & Evnitskaya, N. (2024). Teachers’ multimodal resources for delegated peer repair: Maximizing interactional space in whole-class interaction in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 108(1), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12910
Bukari, F., Lomotey, C. F., & Oblie, E. L. (2026). A conversation-analytic perspective of repair initiation in ESL classroom interactions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13, Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06178-9
Caronia, L., & Nasi, N. (2022). The communicative constitution of epistemic and deontic authority: Epistemological implications of a second-order construct. In J. Basque, N. Bencherki, & T. Kuhn (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the communicative constitution of organization (pp. 148–164). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003224914-11
Cho, E., Park, H. J. L., & Looney, S. D. (2024). Multimodality in third turn repetitions: Evaluation, mitigation, and the pursuit of responses in a Korean-as-foreign-language classroom. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241241037
Cortés-Morales, A., Marzabal, A., & Couso, D. (2025). Dialogical modelling processes: conversations for the social construction of scientific models in the science classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 26(4), 867–883. https://doi.org/10.1039/d5rp00017c
Dai, D. W. (2024). Interactional competence for professional communication in intercultural contexts: Epistemology, analytic framework and pedagogy. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 37(4), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2024.2349781
Doehler, S. P. (2025). Longitudinal perspective on social interaction. In Research Handbook on Social Interaction (pp. 524–540). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035317264.00036
Edelen, D., Bush, S. B., Karp, K. S., Skukauskaitė, A., Roberts, S. K., & Safi, F. (2025). Making visible epistemic authority: A microethnographic examination of children’s authority relationships in early elementary mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2025.2509025
Emrani, F., & Hooshmand, M. (2026). Turn taking, repair initiators, and linguistic categories of self-repair in advanced female Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Language Studies. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17781125
Estaji, M., & Shojakhanlou, M. M. (2023). Engagement in initiation, response and feedback in L2 classroom interactions. Discourse and Interaction, 16(1), 70–92. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2023-1-70
Flensner, K. K. (2017). Discourses of religion and secularism in religious education classrooms. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60949-2
Goffman, E. (2017). Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203788387
Gosen, M. N., Willemsen, A., & Hiddink, F. (2025). Applying conversation analysis to classroom interactions: Students’ ‘oh’-prefaced utterances and the interactional management of explanations. Classroom Discourse, 16(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2024.2397127
Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2013). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th Editio). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269
Hanson, A. (2017). Negative case analysis. In The international encyclopedia of communication research methods. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0165
Hasibuan, D., Suhadi, J., & Manugeren, M. (2025). The Role of Verbal Interaction in Developing Speaking Competence: An Analysis of Fourth-Semester English in classroom. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(4), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i4.1129
Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272505068001
Hidayatullah, E. (2024). Analyzing classroom interactions focusing on IRF patterns and turn-taking. English Learning Innovation, 5(2), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.22219/englie.v5i2.33535
Ishino, M. (2024). Inclusive third-turn repeats: managing or constraining students’ epistemic status? Classroom Discourse, 15(1), 24–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2023.2190033
Iwashita, N., Dao, P., & Nguyen, M. X. N. C. (2025). Understanding interaction in the second language classroom context. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/IWASHI0398
Kaneyasu, M. (2026). “Huh?” “Good!”: Teaching conversational repair in introductory L2 classrooms. Classroom Discourse, 17(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2025.2555006
Khaing, K. K., & Sinwongsuwat, K. (2026). Rethinking teacher third turns in Thai EFL classrooms: An analysis beyond feedback. LEARN Journal, 19(2), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.70730/JOGF8465
Kim, D. R. (2020). Emergence of proactive self-initiated self-repair as an indicator of L2 IC development. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz047
Lee, J. M. (2025). Incorrect or creative answer: Teachers’ third positions in IRF sequences of collaborative teaching. Linguistics and Education, 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2025.101477
Liu, J. E., Lo, Y. Y., & Xin, J. J. (2023). CLIL teacher assessment literacy: A scoping review. Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104150
Lo, Y. Y., & Leung, C. (2022). Conceptualising assessment literacy of teachers in Content and Language Integrated Learning programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2022.2085028
Loder, L. L., Garcez, P. de M., & Kanitz, A. (2021). Other correction and repair as distinct domains in talk-in-interaction. DELTA, 37(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-460X2021370111
Lyu, Q., Chen, W., Cheng, X., & Heng, K. H. (2026). Shifting gaze, shifting performance: The role of individual gaze behavior and joint attention in collaborative learning in tech-enhanced classrooms. Internet and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2026.101104
Mariam, A. (2024). A discourse analysis of blind spots in Sinclair and Coulthard (1992) model of classroom discourse. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies. https://doi.org/10.55493/5019.v13i3.5195
Marian, K. S., & Doehler, S. P. (2026). CA and interactional competence. In The Routledge Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 278–295). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032720852-20
Mathayas, N., & Krist, C. (2026). Re-indexing epistemic responsibility: A grammatical analysis of how a teacher made space for students’ epistemic agency. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 63(1), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.70023
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Harvard University Press.
Molinari, L., Mameli, C., & Gnisci, A. (2013). A sequential analysis of classroom discourse in Italian primary schools: The many faces of the IRF pattern. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02071.x
Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classroom. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Mujiburrahman, M., Zulfikar, T., Ibrahim, I., & Zulfatmi, Z. (2025). Academic discourses on the cognitive revolution and the repositioning of Islamic education in the era of neurosciences. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 25(2), 305–330. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v25i2.25997
Nguyen, H. T., & Malabarba, T. (2026). CA and longitudinal studies. In The Routledge Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 242–259). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032720852-17
Öncü, A., & Taşkın, O. (2020). Opportunity of authentic communication in religious education: A theoretical proposal on the axis of Martin Buber. Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.18505/cuid.697054
Pham, P. A., & Unaldi, A. (2022). Cross-curricular collaboration in a CLIL bilingual context: The perceptions and practices of language teachers and content subject teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.1995320
Poehner, M. E. (2022). Sociocultural considerations of communicative competence. In M. Kanwit & M. Solon (Eds.), Communicative competence in a second language: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 60–75). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003160779-5
Powichit, J., & Todd, R. W. (2026). Maximising salience of interpretivist research findings: A corpus-based approach to extract selection. Corpora. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2026.0354
Ribeiro, A., & Eslami, Z. R. (2025). Second language development in face-to-face versus synchronous computer-mediated interactions: Dyadic type and language proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 29(4), 1780–1806. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221098379
Rühlemann, C., & Barthel, M. (2024). Word frequency and cognitive effort in turns-at-talk: Turn structure affects processing load in natural conversation. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1208029
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
Saprin, S., Achruh, A., Rapi, M., & Rahman, A. (2026). Faith and pedagogy in a global era: Rethinking teaching practices in Islamic higher education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 25(7), 554–574. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.7.25
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Language Learning, 54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00266.x
Sert, O., Gynne, A., & Larsson, M. (2025). Developing student-teachers’ interactional competence through video-enhanced reflection: A discursive timeline analysis of negative evaluation in classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2024.2337184
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2013). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford University Press.
Tai, K. W. H., & Li, W. (2024). Classroom interactional competence in an English-medium instruction mathematics classroom: A creation of a technology-mediated translanguaging space. Learning and Instruction, 90, 101849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101849
Tajeddin, Z., & Nazari, M. (2025). Language teacher identity: A systematic review. In Z. Tajeddin & T. S. C. Farrell (Eds.), Handbook of language teacher education (pp. 35–52). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47310-4_4
Utomo, A. P. Y., Ngabiyanto, Wijayanti, T., Feriady, M., Kesuma, R. G., & Kumalasari, R. (2026). Dialogic critical reading in smart classrooms: IRF configurations and student response quality. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.58256/cssf1e54
van der Meij, S., Gosen, M., & Willemsen, A. (2024). ‘Yes? I have no idea’: Teacher turns containing epistemic disclaimers in upper primary school whole-class discussions. Classroom Discourse, 15(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2022.2103008
Vänttinen, M., & Kääntä, L. (2024). Multimodal blame attributions in technology-supported peer interaction. Classroom Discourse, 15(3), 232–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2023.2292361
Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827826
Wang, F., Kuang, Z., Andrasik, F., & Hu, X. (2026). Instructor’s pointing gestures promote learning more than guiding gaze. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105692
Waring, H. Z. (2009). Moving out of IRF (initiation-response-feedback): A single case analysis. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00526.x
Waring, H. Z. (2015). Theorizing Pedagogical Interaction: Insights from Conversation Analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315751351
Zahner, W., Calleros, E. D., & Pelaez, K. (2021). Designing learning environments to promote academic literacy in mathematics in multilingual secondary mathematics classrooms. ZDM – Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01239-0
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ardianto Ardianto, Agustini Buchari, Faradila Hasan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
