Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) through Role Play and Task-Based Instruction




Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), Role play, Task Based Instruction, English language learning.


This research focuses on several aims, first whether Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) through Role Play and Task Based Instruction best implemented in English learning process in STIE Madani Balikpapan.Second it aims to prove whether Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) can improve students’ English skill based on TOEFL score. Third, it aims to find out students’ perception about the implementation of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in English learning process in STIE Madani Balikpapan.It is a combination of quantitative and qualitative research in which survey, experiment, and interview are done related to the aims of the research. The sample is 37 students from two classes that took English Practice/TOEFL subject in academic year of 2019-2020. The result stated that Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) is best implemented through role play and task based instruction.CLT helps students to better achieve their TOEFL score since there is an increase between the pretest and the post-test. Through the use of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach in class, students feel they have interest more in learning English, do not feel afraid in making mistake again because they know they are still learning, and it helps them better in communication. Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) is a better promising way of learning English since in which students are practicing English as if they are using it in real situation.Further suggestion is that to make use of this approach in classroom activities and encourages students to actively participate in each activities, whether in classroom or outside the classroom. 


Arham, R., Yassi, A. H., & Arafah, B. (2016). The Use of Role Play to Improve Teaching Speaking. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publication, 6.

Calcagni, E., & Lago, L. (2018). The Three Domains for Dialogue: A framework for analysing dialogic approaches to teaching and learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 18, 1–12.

Horwitz, E. K. (2008). Becoming a Language Teacher: Practical Guide to Second Language Learning and Teaching. Boston: Pearson Education.

Hu, G. (2005). Contextual influences on instructional practices: a Chinese case for an ecological approach to ELT. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 635–660.

Krebt, D. M. (2017). The Effectiveness of Role Play Techniques in Teaching Speaking for EFL College Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(5), 863.

Manalullaili. (2015). Applying Communicative Language Teaching in Teaching English for Foreign Language Learners. Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies (ADJES), 2.

Martell, C. C. (2017). Approaches to teaching race in elementary social studies: A case study of preservice teachers. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 41(1), 75–87.

Martono, E. (2013). The Effectiveness of Communicative Language Teaching Method to Enhance The Students’ Motivation in Increasing Their TOEFL Score. Language Circle, Journal of Language and Literature, 7.

Mowlaie, B., & Rahimi, A. (2010). The effect of teachers’ attitude about communicative language teaching on their practice: Do they practice what they preach? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1524–1528.

Mustapha, S. M., & Yahaya, R. A. (2013). Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in Malaysian Context: Its’ Implementation in Selected Community Colleges. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 788–794.

Nita, S. A., & Syafei, F. R. (2012). Involving Audio-lingual Method (ALM) and Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in Teaching Speaking Skill at Junior High School. Journal of English Language Teaching, 1.

Pradipto, Y. D., & Abraham, J. (2014). Psychoanthropology of Power Contestation: Mangunan Alternative Education “Versus†the National Curriculum of the Indonesian Government. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 132, 186–195.

Priyambada, S. A., Mahendrawathi, E. R., & Yahya, B. N. (2017). Curriculum Assessment of Higher Educational Institution Using Aggregate Profile Clustering. Procedia Computer Science, 124, 264–273.

Ratih, R. N., & Hanafi. (2016). The Effect of Using Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) on Speaking Ability. ELLITE, Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 1.

Sarfraz, S., Mansoor, Z., & Tariq, R. (2015). Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions of the Communicative Language Teaching Methodology in the CALL Environment: A Case Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 730–736.

Usmanova, N., Shindina, T., & Basharina, A. (2015). Development and Assessment of Interactive Teaching Approach Impact on Communicative Competence of Bachelors of Economic Universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 729–738.

Vanlommel, K., Van Gasse, R., Vanhoof, J., & Petegem, P. Van. (2018). Teachers’ high-stakes decision making. How teaching approaches affect rational and intuitive data collection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 108–119.

Wahjuni S.IP, S. (2012). Interest Based Language Teachings in EFL for ‘Yahya’ School Teachers: Increasing Communicative Skills and Student-Centered Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 267–282.

Wenjie, C. (2009). Using CLT to improve speaking ability of Chinese non-English major students. University of Wisconsin Platteville.

Woods, D., & Çakır, H. (2011). Two dimensions of teacher knowledge: The case of communicative language teaching. System, 39(3), 381–390.

Yurovsky, D. (2018). A communicative approach to early word learning. New Ideas in Psychology, 50, 73–79.

Yusuf, M., Samsura, D. A. A., & Yuwono, P. S. H. (2018). Toward a framework for an undergraduate academic tourism curriculum in Indonesian Universities: Some perspectives from stakeholders. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 22, 63–74.


Additional Files