Improving Underachiever Students' Mathematics Learning Outcomes: The Effectiveness of the STAD Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24903/bej.v5i1.1270Keywords:
STAD, cooperative learning model, learning outcomes, mathematicsAbstract
This study aims to obtain an objective picture of the effect of the Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) type cooperative learning model on mathematics learning outcomes in underachievers. This research is an actual experiment with a randomized pretest-posttest control group design. The sample of this study consisted of two classes, namely the experimental class and the control class, with a total of 30 people, each determined by random sampling technique. The data analysis technique used is the t-test. The results of this study indicate that the mathematics learning outcome obtained on average in the experimental group is 39.633, while in the control group is 27.267. This means that learning outcomes using the STAD method are better than mathematics learning outcomes using conventional models. The high average score in the experimental group positively affected the testing of hypotheses performed using the t-test
References
(NRC), N. R. (1989). Everybody Count. A Report to The Nation on The Future of Mathematic Education. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Akintunde, D. O., & Olukemi, D. E. (2014). Efficacy of Cooperative and Self-Directed Learning Strategies in Enhancing Mathematics Achievement of Underachieving Gifted Students in Nigeria. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 19(9): 41-50.
Asri, D., Setyowati, P., Hitipeuw, I., & Chusniyah, T. (2017). The Influence of Project-based Learning Strategy and Self-regulated Learning on Academic Procrastination of Junior High School Student Mathematic Learning. American Journal Of Education Research, 5(10): 88-96.
'Aturrahmi, N., & Zikra, Z. (2019). Personality Types of Underachiever Students and the Implication for Guidance and Counseling Services. Jurnal Neo Konseling, 1(4): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.24036/00166kons2019.
Bennett-Rappell, H. (2016). Underachieving gifted students: Two case studies. Issues in Educational Research, 26(3): 407-430.
Fenanlampir, A. B. (2019). The struggle of Indonesian students in the context of TIMSS and PISA has not ended. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(2), 393–406.
Hamdayana, J. (2015). Model dan Metode Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Berkarakter. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Hanurawan, F. (2016). Perspektif Alternatif Dalam Psikologi Pendidikan. Malang: Universitas Negeri malang.
Lie, A. (2008). Cooperative Learning. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Muharom, T. (2014). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Dengan Model Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams Achievement Division (Stad) Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Dan Komunikasi Matematik Peserta Didik Di SMK Negeri Manonjaya Kabupaten Tasikmalaya. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Keguruan, 1(1).
Muhid, A. (2019). Gifted-Underachiever. Malang: Inteligensia Media.
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2015). TIMSS 2015 international results in. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center at Boston College.
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. Boston: Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. .
Nugroho, O. W. (2014). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STSD Terhadap Peningkatan Prestasi Belajar Mata pelajaran IPS pada Siswa Kelas V SD N Karang Duren. Joyyakarta: Universitas Negeri Jogyakarta.
Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan: Membantu Siswa Tumbuh Dan Berkembang. Indonesian translation by Amitya Kumara. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Pratiwi, L. R., & Farozin, M. (2019). Study Habits of Underachievers at Palembang State High School 3. Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar on Guidance and Counseling 2019 (ISGC 2019) (hal. 306-310). Atlantis Press SARL.
Purwanto. (2014). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. (2000). The Underachievement of Gifted Student: What Do We Know and Where We Go? Journal of Gifted Child Quartery, 44(3). 152-170.
Rusman. (2012). Model-model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories An Educational Perspective. Boston: Pearson.
Slavin, R. (2012). Boston . Boston: Person Educational,Inc.
Sulaeman, E., & Choiriah. (2020). ANAK UNDERACHIEVER: ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR PENYEBABNYA. Journal of Early Childhood Education, 1-15.
Sunilawati, N. M. (2013). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stad Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Numerik Siswa Kelas IV SD. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, vol 3.
Supendi, R. P. (2020). Analysis of underachieving students’ problems and the given guidance. ProgCouns, 1(1): 26-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/progcouns.v1i1.31535.
Sutriningsih, N. (2017). Penyebab Siswa Underachiever Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. JURNAL e-DuMath, 3(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.26638/je.459.2064.
Wahab, R. (2005). Anak Berbakat Berprestasi Kurang (The Underachieving Gifted) dan strategi penanganannya. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Luar Biasa, Dirjen Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Departeman Pendidikan Nasional.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
