Navigating Online Assessments in Post-Pandemic Education: Challenges and Strategies

Authors

  • Nia Afliani Universitas Mulawarman
  • Ventje Jany Kalukar Universitas Mulawarman
  • Bibit Suhatmady Universitas Mulawarman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24903/bej.v6i2.1770

Keywords:

Online Assessment, English Lecturers, Post-Pandemic Covid-19

Abstract

This research aims to describe the use of online assessment by English lecturers in the post-pandemic Covid-19 period. Specifically, this research seeks to identify the challenges faced and how to manage them. The research used qualitative descriptive research focusing on interviews and documentation with lecturers at Universitas Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda. The findings revealed that lecturers used various platforms including YouTube, Google Drive, SPADA, Instagram, and Facebook. The challenges found in this research were varied due to the hybrid nature of post-pandemic teaching and learning. Challenges faced by lecturers included behavioral issues such as student discipline, plagiarism, password knowledge, and attendance, as well as technical issues such as students' internet access. To manage these challenges, lecturers implemented strict rules against plagiarism, set clear deadlines, and provided rewards like gamification. They also encouraged students to use their names as usernames and passwords and explained the features of the Learning Management System (LMS) to those unfamiliar with it. Additionally, lecturers shared internet data with students to address technical problems. Overall, the research found that online assessment appears to be a solution to meet the needs of lecturers and students, making teaching and learning accessible everywhere, effective, and reaching the target material taught for one semester.

References

Arbain, A., & Nur, D. R. (2018). The Use of Magic and Fairy Tale Dice to Improve Students’ Ability in Writing Narrative Text. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intellectuals’ Global Responsibility (ICIGR 2017). https://doi.org/10.2991/icigr-17.2018.22

Bahar, M., & Asil, M. (2018). Attitude towards e-assessment: influence of gender, computer usage and level of education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 33(3), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1503529

Bubaš, G., & Čižmešija, A. (2023). A Critical Analysis of Students’ Cheating in Online Assessment in Higher Education: Post-COVID-19 Issues and Challenges Related to Conversational Artificial Intelligence. 2023 46th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO), 905–910. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO57284.2023.10159826

Bukhari, G. M. J., Saleem, J., Bukhari, S. A. J., Ishaq, M., & Butt, M. S. (2022). Challenges in conducting online assessments in undergraduate medical and dental education: a scoping review. BioMedica, 38(3), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.51441/BioMedica/5-764

Creswell, W. J., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth Edit). SAGE Publications.

El Mourabit, I., Jai Andaloussi, S., Miyara, M., & Ouchetto, O. (2023). Identification of Online Learning Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Developing Countries. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 18(08), 238–258. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i08.36747

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Faizah, U., Ambarwati, R., & Rahayu, D. (2021). From offline to online learning: various efforts to secure the learning process during covid-19 outbreaks. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747(1), 012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012002

Hatch, J. A. (2010). Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. State University of New York Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=h96R53BDEsoC

Kaufmann, A., Barcomb, A., & Riehle, D. (2020). Supporting Interview Analysis with Autocoding. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2020.094

Kearns, L. R. (2012). Student Assessment in Online Learning: Challenges and Effective Practice. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 198.

Lahiri, S. (2023). A Qualitative Research Approach is an Inevitable Part of Research Methodology : An Overview. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 5(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i03.3178

Liu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2022). Exploring the Influencing Factors and Validity of Formative Assessment in Online Learning. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 9(4), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v9i4.4288

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Method Sourcebook Edition 3 (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Inc.

Nur, D. R. (2020). Virtual Reality adoption in Indonesia higher Education from lecturer’s voice. English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education, 8(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.25273/etj.v8i1.6672

Praditha, E., & Nur, D. R. (2019). Students’ Problem in Using English E-Learning in SMP Katolik 1 WR.Soepratman Samarinda. Borneo Educational Journal (Borju), 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24903/bej.v1i2.609

Reyes-Chua, E., Navigar, N. R., Rosario, L. M. D., Umagap, R. T., Mallorca, C. J. B., & Solina, A. M. (2023). Use of technological teaching strategies in the institute of graduate studies: Professorial lecturers’ perspectives. Nucleation and Atmospheric Aerosol, 040005. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0124520

Teräs, M., Suoranta, J., Teräs, H., & Curcher, M. (2020). Post-Covid-19 Education and Education Technology ‘Solutionism’: a Seller’s Market. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 863–878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00164-x

Illustrated by AI

Downloads

Published

2024-08-30

How to Cite

Afliani, N., Ventje Jany Kalukar, & Bibit Suhatmady. (2024). Navigating Online Assessments in Post-Pandemic Education: Challenges and Strategies. Borneo Educational Journal (Borju), 6(2), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.24903/bej.v6i2.1770

Issue

Section

Articles