The EFL Lecturers’ Feedback on Pre-Service Teachers’ Writing Performance In Online Instruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24903/bej.v3i2.781Keywords:
EFL Lectures, feedback, teachers, writing performance, online instructionAbstract
Based on the facts about problems in teaching and learning of writing, it shows that the teaching learning of English in classrooms has not achieved the goals yet. Many students face many problems in writing. In addition, because of the situation happen in our world caused by Pandemic, it poses a special challenge for educators because in this situation learning takes place online. In this case, feedback is considered the most important factor in determining the success of the message to be conveyed to the recipient of the message. Concerning to the learning, Irons (2008) suggests that feedback is any information, process or activity carried out to accelerate student learning based on comments related to the results of assessing student development. In conducting a research entitled “The EFL Lecturers Feedback on Pre-Service Teacher Writing Performance in Online Instruction†in which this aims at identifying the types of feedback provided by lecturers on pre service teachers’ writing performance in online instruction and also to describe the implementation of the feedback provided by lecturers on pre-service teacher writing performance in online instruction. By means of applying interviews to 3 writing lecturers of faculty of culture, management, and business at UNDIKMA, the lecturer lecturers often used direct corrective feedback and electronic feedback in giving feedback on pre-service teacher writing performance in online instruction. The lecturers give some signs or clue to indicate the students writing mistakes, repeated explanations, add closeness to communication and give alternative answer for each students mistakes. It was also found that the feedback provide by the lecturers contain affective points. it also found that the implementation of lecturer feedback was more focused on general level feedback concerning the results of students' writing. the implementation of feedback emphasizes communication so that the feedback process can run smoothly, provides detailed explanations and gives students the opportunity to correct their mistakes in writing.
References
[2] Allin, L. and Turnock, C. 2007. Assessing student performance in work-based learning Antar semi. 1990.menulis efektif. Padang; CV Angkasa Raya.
[3] Arikunto, S., 2009. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Edisi Revisi 6. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
[4] Atar M, Semi. 1993. Metode Penelitian Sastra, Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa Blanchard, Karen and Christine Root, Ready to Write, New York: Pearson Education Inc., 2003.
[5] Bloxham, S., Boyd, P. 2007. Developing Effective Assessment In Higher Education. NewYork: Open University Press.
[6] Brown, H. Douglas.2004. Language Assessment: principles and language practices. New York: Pearson Education Inc.
[7] Burns. Anne. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[8] Carr, Caleb T., & Hayes, Rebecca A. 2015. Social Media: Definin, Developing, and Diviningl, Atlantic Journal of Communication.
[9] Cisco. 2001. e-learning: Combines Communication, Education, Information, and Training, http://www.cisco.com.Corder, S.P. (1967). The Significance of Learners’ Errors. Dicetak dalam J.C.Richards (ed.) (1974, 1984) Error Analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. London: Longman.
[10] Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research 4th Edition. Boston: Pearson
[11] Creswell, John W. 2009. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, & Mixed Method Approaches. United States of America. SAGE Publication, Inc.
[12] Dabbagh, Nada & Bannan-Ritland, Brenda. 2005. Online learning, concepts, strategies, and application.Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson Education, Inc.
[13] Denzin. N.K &Licoln Y.S. 1994. The Descipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
[14] Djamarah Syaiful Bahri. 2002. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
[15] Dunn, William N. (2003). Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
[16] Eggen & Kauchak (1998) . Methods for Teaching. Jakarta : Pustaka Pelajar
[17] Ellis, R.(2009).A typology of written corrective feedback types.ELT Journal63(2).Oxford University Press.
[18] Fathman, A., & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher Response to Student Writing: Focus on Form verus
[19] Content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Gage, N.L. & Berliner, David, C. (1984). Educational Psychology 3rd Ed. Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company.
[20] Gagne, Robert. M. (1985). The Conditioning of Learning nd Theory of Instruction. 4th Ed New York : Holt, Rinehart.
[21] Gebhard, GF. (1996). Teaching English as a Foreign Language. The University o Michigan.
[22] Gie, The Liang. 2002. Terampil Mengarang. Yogyakarta: Balai Pustaka
[23] Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, E. Rolph, Tatham, L. Ronald, Black, C. William, 1998. Multivariate Data analysis. 5 th eds. New York: Prentice Hall Internasional Inc
[24] Haryadi & Zamzani. (1996). Peningkatan Keterampilan Berbahasa Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Depdikbud.
[25] Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research,
[26] Haughey, M. & Anderson, T. (1998). Networking Learning: The Pedagogy of the Internet. Montreal: Cheneliere/ McGraw-Hill.
[27] Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and Resourcing Writing. London: Longman
[28] Joughin, G. (2009). Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education. Australia:
CEDIR, University of Wollongong.
[29] Kuswarno, Engkus (2009). Metedologi Penelitian Komunikasi Fenomenologi; Konsepsi, Pedoman, dan Contoh Penelitian, Bandung: Widya Padjajaran.
[30] Leki, Ilona (1991). The Preference of ESL Student for Error Correction in College-Level Writing Class. Foreign Language Annals Vol.24,no:3.
[31] Lewis. 2002. Lesson Study: A Handbook of Teacher-Led Instructional. Philadelphia. PA:Research for Better Schools.
[32] Nurgiyantoro, Burhan.(2001). Menulis Secara Populer. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
[33] Oshima, A, & Ann Hogue. (2007). Introduction in academic writing. Pearson Education: New York.
[34] Petri, Herbert L.,(1986) Motivation: Theory and Research, Belmunt, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company
[35] Purbo, Ono W. (2002).Buku Pintar Internet Teknologi E-Learning Berbasis Php dan Mysql Merencanakan dan Mengimplementasikan Sistem E-Learning. Jakarta. Elex Media Komputindo.
[36] Raimes, A (1983). Techniques in teaching writing. New York: Oxford University. Press.
[37] Richard, J.C and Renandya, W.A.(2002). Methodology in Language Teaching. Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.
[38] Rofi’uddin, Ahmad& Zuhdi, Darmiyati. 1999. Pendidikan Bahasa dan SastraIndonesia di Kelas Tinggi. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti Depdikbud.
[39] Suparno. 2008. Ketrampilan Dasar Menulis. Jakarta : Universitas Terbuka.
[40] Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 2008. Menulis sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa.
[41] Tulgan, B. 1999. FAST Feedback. Massachusetts: HRD Press, Inc.
[42] White, Fred D, the Writer’s Art. A Practical Rhetoric and Handbook, (New York: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1986
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
