Main Article Content


This research aims to develop weblog as media in teaching writing of senior high school students.

It is a research and development (R&D) study that follows ASSURE model proposed by Heinrich and developed by Smaldino, Heinich, Molenda, & Russell (2005:49). The procedure of developing media consisted of analyzing learner, stating objective, selecting media, utilizing media, requiring learner participation, evaluating and revising.

The product was examined by the media expert. After conducting the first test, the second test was conducted by English teacher and students. The subjects of this research were the eleventh grade students of PGN 1 High school. The subject consisted of 19 students of class XI. The researcher used an interview and questionnaires as the data collecting technique. The questionnaires were distributed for needs analysis and expert validation. English teacher and students’ responded toward the developed weblog. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics for the questionnaires and the qualitative analysis technique for the interview.

The findings revealed that the developed weblog as online media in teaching writing is categorized “very good” by experts with the mean scores put on 3.82. The result score of tryout is 3.48 and categorized as very good. The English teacher’s response towards the weblog show the range of average mean score on 3.69 categorized “very good”. Therefore, the developed weblog is very appropriate to use in teaching and learning process of writing.


CALL Weblog Writing Senior High school

Article Details

How to Cite
PradanaS., & AshadiA. (2019). Weblog as an Appropriate Online Medium in Teaching Writing. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching, 4(2), 125-134.


  1. Başöz, T., & Çubukçu, F. (2014). Pre-service EFL Teacher’s Attitudes towards Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 531–535.
  2. Beatty, K. (2013). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning, Second edition. Teaching and Researching Computer-Assisted Language Learning, Second edition.
  3. Falloon, G. (1999). Developing exemplary practice: why are some teachers better at it than others. Computers in New Zealand Schools, 11(3), 19–23.
  4. Fraser, M. (1994). Quality in higher education: an international perspective. In D. Green (Ed.), What is Quality in Higher Education (pp. 101–111). Buckingham: Open University press and Society for Research into Higher Education.
  5. Hietanen, L., Ruokonen, I., Ruismäki, H., & Enbuska, J. (2016). Student Teachers’ Guided Autonomous Learning: Challenges and Possibilities in Music Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 257–267.
  6. Hubbard, P. (1983). Language Teaching Approaches, The evaluation of CALL Software and Design Implications. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
  7. Karimkhanlooei, G., & Seifiniya, H. (2015). Teaching Alphabet, Reading and Writing for Kids between 3-6 Years Old as a Second Language. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 769–777.
  8. Kim, M., & Crossley, S. A. (2018). Modeling second language writing quality: A structural equation investigation of lexical, syntactic, and cohesive features in source-based and independent writing. Assessing Writing, 37, 39–56.
  9. Kramer, Ij. M., & Kusurkar, R. A. (2017). Science-writing in the blogosphere as a tool to promote autonomous motivation in education. The Internet and Higher Education, 35, 48–62.
  10. Lasagabaster, D., & Manuel Sierra, J. (2003). Students’ evaluation of CALL software programs. Educational Media International, 40(3–4), 293–304.
  11. Lee, M.-K. (2015). Peer feedback in second language writing: Investigating junior secondary students’ perspectives on inter-feedback and intra-feedback. System, 55, 1–10.
  12. Leiker, A. M., Bruzi, A. T., Miller, M. W., Nelson, M., Wegman, R., & Lohse, K. R. (2016). The effects of autonomous difficulty selection on engagement, motivation, and learning in a motion-controlled video game task. Human Movement Science, 49, 326–335.
  13. Pirasteh, P. (2014). The Effectiveness of Computer-assisted Language Learning (CALL) on Learning Grammar by Iranian EFL Learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1422–1427.
  14. Rafiee, S. J., & Purfallah, S. A. (2014). Perceptions of Junior High school Teachers toward Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) within the Context of Azarbayjan Provinces. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1445–1453.
  15. Smaldino, S., Lowther, D., & Russell, J. (2005). The ASSURE Model: Creating the Learning Experience. Instructional Technology and Media for Learning.
  16. Stickler, U., & Shi, L. (2016). TELL us about CALL: An introduction to the Virtual Special Issue (VSI) on the development of technology enhanced and computer assisted language learning published in the System Journal. System, 56, 119–126.
  17. Su, C., Tseng, C., Jang, J.-S. R., & Visceglia, T. (2018). A hierarchical linguistic information-based model of English prosody: L2 data analysis and implications for computer-assisted language learning. Computer Speech & Language, 51, 44–67.
  18. Suharto, G. (2006). Pengukuran penilaian hasil belajar bahasa inggris. Yogyakarta: P3B UNY.
  19. Terrill, L. (2000). Benefits and Challenges in Using Computers and the Internet with Adult English Learners. National Center for ESL Literacy Education (NCLE).
  20. Thomas, M. (2014). Effective Teaching: a Measure of Excellence (5th editio). New Delhi; S. Chand & Company Ltd.
  21. Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. The Modern Language Journal.
  22. Weller, M., Pegler, C., & Mason, R. (2005). Use of innovative technologies on an e-learning course. Internet and Higher Education.
  23. Zaini, A., & Mazdayasna, G. (2014). The Effect of Computer Assisted Language Learning on the Development of EFL Learners’ Writing Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1975–1982.