Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to get description of Cooperative Learning application using Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) type to improve students’ motivation and independence learning level. The applied research method was classroom action research. The observations have been done during seven cycles to research the subjects; those are students of Basic Academic Reading Class C of 2018/2019 at department of management, faculty of economy, Universitas Islam Indonesia. The result showed that the number of students achieving maximum scores (A) has significantly increased, up to 31% of previous year as the baseline. Meanwhile, the average students’ attendances in entire semester have also increased up to 13% of previous year baseline. The questionnaire was also distributed before and after cycles to measure the changes in students’ perception of their motivation and independent learning level. The result indicated the increase in average score of every aspect in all variables. However, the result of independent sample t-test showed that sig (2-tailed) score of students’ motivation and independence learning level have significant differences. Thus, it is concluded that Cooperative Learning model on Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) type has a positive and significant impact on developing student’s motivation and independent learning level.

Keywords

Academic Reading Academic Skill Cooperative Learning STAD

Article Details

Author Biography

Fuad Hasyim, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Dosen Mata Kuliah Umum Bahasa Inggris di Departemen Manajemen Fakultas Ekonomi. Fokus riset pada TEFL, English Literature, and American Studies
How to Cite
HasyimF. (2019). Cooperative Learning Approach to an English Academic Reading Course. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching, 4(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v4i2.338

References

  1. Al-Jarrah, H. (2018). Reading Comprehension Strategies among EFL Learners in Higher Learning Institutions. Arab World English Journal, 9(2), 315–328.
  2. Alexander, O., Sloan, D., Hughes, K., & Ashby, S. (2017). Engaging with quality via the CEM model: Enhancing the content and performance management of postgraduate in-sessional academic skills provision. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 27, 56–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.04.005
  3. Alghamdy, R. Z. (2019). EFL Learners ’ Reflections on Cooperative Learning : Issues of Implementation. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(3), 271–277.
  4. Amornsinlaphachai, P. (2014). Designing a Learning Model Using the STAD Technique with a Suggestion System to Decrease Learners’ Weakness. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 431–435. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.235
  5. Bibbings, H., Bieluga, P. A., & Mills, C. (2018). Enhancing Creativity and Independent Learning of Architectural Technology Students Through The Use of A Real Life Design Competition Module, 12(1), 376–388.
  6. Chevalier, J. M., & Daniel J. Buckles. (2008). SAS: A Guide to Collaborative Inquiry and Social Engagement (1st ed.). Ottawa Cairo: Sage Publication Ltd.
  7. Damopolii, M. Y. (2014). Action Research: Teori, Model, dan Aplikasi. (N. I. F. Sirate, Ed.). Kencana PrenadaMedia Group.
  8. Denton, C. A., Wolters, C. A., York, M. J., Swanson, E., Kulesz, P. A., & Francis, D. J. (2015). Adolescents’ use of reading comprehension strategies: Differences related to reading proficiency, grade level, and gender. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 81–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.016
  9. Essien, A. M. (2015). Effectiveness of cooperative learning methodology in improving students ’ learning attitudes towards English language. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 08(02), 119–127.
  10. Feragen, K. B., Aukner, R., Særvold, T. K., & Hide, Ø. (2017). Speech, language, and reading skills in 10-year-old children with palatal clefts: The impact of additional conditions. Journal of Communication Disorders, 66, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2017.03.001
  11. Fonteyne, L., Duyck, W., & De Fruyt, F. (2017). Program-specific prediction of academic achievement on the basis of cognitive and non-cognitive factors. Learning and Individual Differences, 56, 34–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.05.003
  12. Fuller, B., Bein, E., Bridges, M., Kim, Y., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2017). Do academic preschools yield stronger benefits? Cognitive emphasis, dosage, and early learning. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 52, 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.05.001
  13. Goux, D., Gurgand, M., & Maurin, E. (2017). Reading enjoyment and reading skills: Lessons from an experiment with first grade children. Labour Economics, 45, 17–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2016.09.007
  14. Guthrie, J. T., Klauda, S. L., & Morrison, D. A. (2012). Motivation, Achievement, and Classroom Context for Information Book Reading. In Adolescents’ Engagement in Academic Literacy (pp. 1–51).
  15. Hermida, J. (2009). The Importance of Teaching Academic Reading Skills in First-Year University Courses. The International Journal of Research and Review, 3(September), 20–30.
  16. Idress, M., & Chew, K. H. (2018). Implementation of Cooperative Learning to Enhance Student Learning in Well Stimulation Technique Class. In Proceedings - 2017 7th World Engineering Education Forum, WEEF 2017- In Conjunction with: 7th Regional Conference on Engineering Education and Research in Higher Education 2017, RCEE and RHEd 2017, 1st International STEAM Education Conference, STEAMEC 2017 and 4th Innovative Practices in Higher Education Expo 2017, I-PHEX 2017 (pp. 773–776). https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF.2017.8467095
  17. Jamaludin, M., & Mokhtar, M. F. (2018). Students Team Achievement Division. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(2), 570–577. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i2/3966
  18. Katherine McWhaw, H. S., & Abrami, J. S. and P. C. (2003). From co-operation to collaboration- Helping students become collaborative learners. In R. M. Gillies & A. F. Ashman (Eds.), Cooperative Learning: The Social and Intellectual Outcomes of Learning in Groups (p. 69). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203465264
  19. Kesby, M., Kindon, S., & Pain, R. (2007). Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
  20. Kourakli, M., Altanis, I., Retalis, S., Boloudakis, M., Zbainos, D., & Antonopoulou, K. (2017). Towards the improvement of the cognitive, motoric and academic skills of students with special educational needs using Kinect learning games. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 11, 28–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2016.10.009
  21. Lander, J., Seeho, S., & Foster, K. (2019). Learning Practical Research Skills Using An Academic Paper Framework – An Innovative, Integrated Approach. Health Professions Education, 5(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2018.06.002
  22. Manoli, P., Papadopoulou, M., & Metallidou, P. (2016). Investigating the immediate and delayed effects of multiple-reading strategy instruction in primary EFL classrooms. System, 56, 54–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.11.003
  23. Mufidah, I. A. (2013). Student team achievement division (STAD) technique in teaching reading. Lingua Scientia, 5(2), 199–205.
  24. Nair, S. M., & Sanai, M. (2018). Effects of utilizing the stad method (Cooperative learning approach) in enhancing students’ descriptive writing skills. International Journal of Education and Practice, 6(4), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2018.64.239.252
  25. O’Byrne, W. I. (2016). Four steps to conducting action research in the classroom.
  26. Rushton, K. (2007). The significance of text in the teaching of reading in the early years The importance of the relationship of the school to the learners ’ community, 256–268.
  27. Sidek, H. M. (2014). English Language Reading Preparation for Higher Education. Social Science and Humanities, 22(2), 539–558.
  28. Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice (2nd ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
  29. Sommet, N. (2015). The student-institution fit at university : interactive effects of academic competition and social, 6(June), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00769
  30. Tang, X., Kikas, E., Pakarinen, E., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Muotka, J., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2017). Profiles of teaching practices and reading skills at the first and third grade in Finland and Estonia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 150–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.020
  31. Tohamba, C. P. P. (2017). The Use of STAD Technique to Improve the Students ’ Reading Achievement at Class XI IA1 of SMAN 7 Kendari. Journal of English Education, 2(2), 105–112.
  32. Trigo, R. M., Pellerano, B. D., & Jara, M. M. (2014). Satisfaction in Academically Vulnerable Students: A Quality Factor in a Program Aimed at Leveling Basic Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 132, 160–165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.293
  33. Wigfield, A., Cambria, J., & Ho, A. N. (2012). Motivation for Reading Information Texts. In Adolescents’ Engagement in Academic Literacy (pp. 52–98).
  34. Woodruff Carr, K., Fitzroy, A. B., Tierney, A., White-Schwoch, T., & Kraus, N. (2017). Incorporation of feedback during beat synchronization is an index of neural maturation and reading skills. Brain and Language, 164, 43–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.005
  35. Yeganeh, M. T., & Malekzadeh, P. (2015). The Effect of Bilingualism on the Developing of English Reading Skill. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 803–810. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.099
  36. Yu, Y. (2019). The Research on Cooperative Learning in English Reading Teaching in College. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(6), 678–687.