Cinematic Metaphors in Jokowi’s International Political Speeches: A Conceptual Metaphor Theory Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24903/bej.v8i2.2321Keywords:
cinematic metaphor, critical metaphor analysis, Jokowi, political speech, conceptual metaphor theoryAbstract
Language plays a central role in political communication, particularly through the use of metaphor, which enables leaders to simplify complex issues and influence public perception. In the digital era, cinematic metaphors drawn from popular films and television series have become increasingly visible in political discourse. This study examines cinematic metaphors in two of President Joko Widodo’s international speeches delivered in 2018. Using a descriptive qualitative design, the analysis applies Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Critical Metaphor Analysis to identify and interpret metaphors derived from Avengers: Infinity War and Game of Thrones. Fourteen cinematic metaphors were identified and categorized into four conceptual mappings: ECONOMIC CONFLICT IS WAR, LEADERS ARE HEROES, ECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY IS NATURAL DISASTER, and INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS ARE A GAME OF POWER. The findings show that these metaphors function not only as linguistic devices but also as rhetorical strategies that construct meaning, highlight global risks, and legitimize Jokowi’s call for cooperation. The study concludes that cinematic metaphors enhance accessibility and emotional resonance in political messaging by connecting global issues with familiar cultural narratives. The originality of this research lies in its focus on cinematic metaphors in Indonesian political speech—an area rarely examined in prior studies—and its integration of cognitive and rhetorical perspectives to explain how popular culture shapes contemporary political discourse.
References
Arikunto, S. (2009). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Bateman, J., & Schmidt, K. (2013). Multimodal film analysis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203128220
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. In Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612
Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric. In Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230319899
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218
Coëgnarts, M. (2017). Cinema and the embodied mind: metaphor and simulation in understanding meaning in films. Palgrave Communications, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.67
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Forceville, C. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Mouton de Gruyter.
Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. (2025). Introducing multimodality. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003513698
Katsaridou, M., & Kostopoulou, L. (2024). Digital realities and metaphorical constructs: A multimodal semiotic and intermedial analysis of Blade Runner 2049. Digital Age in Semiotics & Communication, 7, 164–182. https://doi.org/10.33919/dasc.24.7.11
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Metaphor and culture. Oxford University Press eBooks, 2(2), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.003.0005
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2024). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Musolff, A. (2016). Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. Bloomsbury Academic.
Prabhakaran, V., Rei, M., & Shutova, E. (2021). How Metaphors Impact Political Discourse: A Large-Scale Topic-Agnostic Study using Neural Metaphor Detection. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 15, 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18079
Sihaloho, S. M. A., & Simatupang, E. C. (2020). Figurative Language of Cinema World in Joko Widodo Speech. English Journal Literacy UTama, 4(1), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.33197/ejlutama.vol4.iss1.2020.386
Steen, G. (2008). The Paradox of Metaphor: Why we need a Three-Dimensional Model of Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802426753
Sugiyono, P, D. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif,Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Surip, M., & Lubis, M. J. (2022). Types of political metaphors in the Indonesian mass media. Humanus, 21(2), 282. https://doi.org/10.24036/humanus.v21i2.119817
Taiwo, R. (2009). Legitimization and coercion in political discourse: A case study of Olusegun Obasanjo address to the PDP elders and stakeholders forum. Journal of political discourse analysis, 2(2), 191-205.
Tewarat, S. H., & Triyono, S. (2019). Analyzing the President Joko Widodo’s international speech: A study on critical linguistics. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 231–247
Van Vo, T. (2015). Lodico, M., Spaulding, D. & Voegtle, K. (2010). Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice, 2nd Edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 14(3), 78–79. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v14i3.103
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nana Asrianti, Dyah Sunggingwati, Noor Rachmawaty, Iwan Setiawan, Ventje Jany Kalukar, Istanti Hermagustiana, Sunardi Sunardi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

