Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to find out the description of conflict management of teachers and principals at primary schools in Kutai Kartanegara and to find out whether conflict management affects the effectiveness of school management. The research method used is quantitative approach. Data collection techniques used questionnaires and data analysis techniques using descriptive and inferential statistics. From result of hypothesis test that there is a significant and positive influence between managerial ability to school management effectiveness with Fcount test result 78,794> 3,875 Ftabel with sig = 0,000 <5% this means linear regression model can be used to predict influence of conflict management to effectiveness of school management. Result of determinant test 0,220 can be interpreted that equal to 22,0% effectiveness variable can be influenced by conflict management variable and the rest influenced other variable not examined in this research. Based on the result of instrument score of variables of conflict management, the distribution is in the medium category and based on inferential test can be concluded that conflict management has a significant positive effect on the effectiveness of school management.

Article Details

How to Cite
SalimN. A., HarunaJ., & SarakaS. (2017). ANALISIS PENGARUH MANAJEMEN KONFLIK TERHADAP EFEKTIVITAS PENGELOLAAN SD DI KAB. KUTAI KARTANEGARA. PENDAS MAHAKAM: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar , 2(3), 250-260. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fkip-uwgm.ac.id/index.php/pendasmahakam/article/view/169

References

  1. Amir, M. Taufik. Merancang Kuesioner: Konsep dan Panduan untuk Penelitian Sikap, Kepribadian dan Perilaku. Jakarta: Kencana, 2015
  2. Akdon, Strategic Management For Education Management. Bandung: Alfabeta. 2006
  3. Campbell. Riset dalam Efektivitas Organisasi, Terjemahan Sahat Simamora. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1989
  4. Handayaningrat, Soewarno. Pengantar Studi Ilmu Administrasi dan Manajemen. Jakarta : CV. Haji Masagung, 1994
  5. James. LG, dkk. Organization (behavior, structurre, processes). New York: Mc. Graw-Hill, 2012
  6. Luthans, Fred. Organizational Behavior, (Interpreting VA Yuwono, et al), Edition Indonesian, Yogyakarta: ANDI, 2008
  7. M.E, David, Oliver U, Doris O. Avoiding School Management Conflict and Crisis thrugh Formal Comunication. Journal of Education and Practice. 2015. www.iiste.org. Diakses 22 Desember 2016.
  8. Mulyasa, E. Menjadi Kepala Sekolah Profesional. Bandung: PT Remana Rosdakarya, 2003
  9. Robbins And Coneter, Manager. Edisi Bhs. Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Prenhallindo, 1999
  10. Robbins, S. R. dan Marry Coutler. Manajemen Edisi ke 8. Jakarta: PT. Indeks, 2007
  11. Robbins, Stephen P. Teori Organisasi. Struktur, Desain & Aplikasi. Jakarta: Penerbit Arcan, 1994
  12. Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfaberta: 2013
  13. Sule, Erni Trisnawati dan Kurniawan Saefullah, Pengantar Manajemen, Jakarta: Kencana 2006
  14. Sumidjo, Wahjo. Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.2003
  15. Steers, M. Richard. Efektivitas Organisasi. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1985
  16. Tampubolon, Manahan P.. Perilaku Keorganisasian (Organization Behavior). Perspektif Organisasi Bisnis. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2008
  17. Tangkilisan dan Hessel Nogi S. Manajemen Publik. Jakarta: Gramedia Widia Sarana Indonesia, 2005
  18. Usman, Husaini. Manajemen Teori. Praktik dan Riset Pendidikan Edisi 4. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2014
  19. Winardi, Manajemen Konflik : Konflik Perubahan dan Pengembangan, Bandung : Mandar Maju, 1994
  20. Winardi, J. Manajemen Perilaku Organisasi, Jakarta: Kencana Predana Media Group 2007

Most read articles by the same author(s)