The Influence of Principal Leadership and Work Motivation to Teachers Performance at Elementary School In District Samarinda Ilir Samarinda Year 2017
Abstract
This study aims to determine the influence of leadership of the Principal with the performance of teachers, the influence of teacher work motivation with teacher performance, the influence of leadership of Principal and teacher work motivation together with teacher performance. The population of this research is 90 elementary school teachers in 9 primary schools. Given the population is limited then this study is a population study where the sample research is the entire population of teachers in the State Elementary School Samarinda Ilir. The research method used quantitative method with regression analysis. The result of descriptive analysis revealed that the performance of teacher of majority in medium category that is equal to 63%, majority of headmaster leadership in medium category that is equal to 71%, and at work motivation of majority teacher in medium category that is equal to 69,6%. So that is so descriptively both teacher performance, Principal leadership and teacher work motivation is in medium category. The results of the study found that: (a) there was influence of Headmaster Leader's variables (X1) with teacher performance variable (Y) at the strong closeness level, that is 0,749 with coefficient determination 0,561, and regression equation Ŷ = 67,402 +0,456 X1 (b ) There is influence of teacher work motivation variable (X2) with teacher performance variable (Y) at moderate level, that is 0,749 with coefficient determination 0,561, and regression equation Ŷ = 60,734 + 0,572X2 (C) there is influence of leadership variable of Principal (X1) and teacher work motivation variable (X2) together with teacher performance variable (Y) at strong level of closeness, that is equal to 0,774 with coefficient determination 0,600 and regression equation Ŷ = 57,299 + 0.340 X1 + 0.236X2. The conclusion of this research is that improving the performance of elementary school teachers in Samarinda Ilir can be done by improving principal leadership and teacher work motivation.
References
Arikunto, Suharsimi, Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2002.
Hamalik, Oemar, Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusi, Managemen Pelatihan Ketenagakerjaan, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara,2000.
Hasibuan, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2000.
Henderte, Aji N, Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Motivasi Kerja dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Kantor Dinas Pendapatan Daerah Pemerintah Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara. Purwokerto: Tesis, 2005.
Ismail Mohamad. Manajemen Operasional Sekolah. Bandung: PT RemajaRosdakarya. 2004
Safaria Trioantoro. Kepemimpinan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2004
Sardiman. Interaksi Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Perss, 2006
Saydam Gauzali, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Jakarta: Toko Gugug Agung, 2000
Sedarmayanti, Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja, Bandung:Mandar Maju, 2001
Sondang P. Siagian. Teori & Praktek Kepemimpinan. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, 2003
Siagian, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Jakarta: BumiAksara,1995.
Simamora Hendy. Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia. Yogyakarya: STIE YKPN. 2004
Sudarmo, Gito dan N. Sudito, Manajemen Bisnis, Yogyakarta: BPFE Gajah Mada, 1997.
Sugiyono, Statistik Untuk Penelitian, Bandung: Alfabeta , 2009.
Tangkilisan H.N.S., Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Birokrasi Publik, Yogyakarta: Lukman Ofset, 2003.
Theories Of Motivatian. http://www.laynetworks.com/Motivation.html, tanggal 26 Desember 2013
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen, Jakarta: Cemerlang, 2005
Usman Husaini. Manajemen Teori, Praktik, dan Riset Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2006
Werther William B,Human Resaources and Personel Management, New York: Mc. Graw-Hill, 1986
Yuniarsih, Tjutju dan Suwatno, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Bandung: Alvabeta, 2008
