The Effectiveness of Flip Classroom with Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) Method to Teach Reading Viewed from Students’ English Learning Interest

Sunarti Sunarti -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia
Dzul Rachman* -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24903/sj.v3i2.246

The study is aimed: (1) To know whether Flip Classroom with STAD method is more effective than Traditional Instruction to teach reading; (2) to know whether the students who have high learning interest have better reading comprehension than those who have low learning interest; and (3) to know whether there is an interaction between Flip Classroom with teaching methods and students’ learning interest. The population of the research is the First year students of Public Health. The samples were from two classes. In taking the sample, cluster random sampling approach was used. Each class was divided into two groups (the students who have high and low learning interest). Then, the techniques which have been used to accumulate the information had been questionnaire student learning interest and reading test. The data were analyzed by using multifactor analysis of ANOVA 2x2 and Tuckey test. There are some research findings: (1) Flip Classroom with STAD method is more effective than Traditional Instruction to teach reading; (2) the reading comprehension of the students who have high learning interest is better than that of those who have low learning interest because; and (3) there is an interaction between teaching methods and learning interest for teaching reading. It is concluded that there is an interaction impact among methods and students’ learning interest for teaching reading. Flip Classroom with STAD is suitable for students having high learning interest and Traditional Instruction is suitable for students having low learning interest.

Keywords
Flip classroom; Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD); Teaching Reading; English Learning Interest
  1. Arbain, A. (2017). Techniques for Teaching Speaking Skill in Widya Gama Mahakam University. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 2(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v2i1.80
  2. Elliot, S. N. et al. (1999). Educational Psychology: Effective Teaching, Effective Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill College.
  3. Fischer & Horstendahl. (2004). Motivation, Emotion, and Cognition. Retrieved from books.google.co.id/books
  4. Fraenkel and Wallen. (2000). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: Mc Graw – Hill, Inc.
  5. Hurlock, E. B. (1983). Child Development. New Jerssey: Mc Graw-Hill.
  6. McConel, D. (2006). E-Learning Groups and Communities. New York: Open University Press.
  7. Network, F. L. (2014). The Four Pillars of FLIPTM. Retrieved from http://www.ssfudes.com/veille/leveilleur/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/FLIP_handout_FNL_Web.pdf
  8. Nur, D. rahman. (2017). An analysis of the Feminist characters in Kate Chopin’s “the awakening.” Journal of English Educators Society, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21070/jees.v2i1.687
  9. Penny, U. (2000). Discussions that work ‘task-centred practice. New York: Cambridge university press.
  10. Stone, B. B. (2012). Flip Your Classroom to Increase Active Learning and Student Engagement. Paper Presented at the Proceedings from 28th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning, Madison.
  11. Westwood, P. (2001). Reading and Learning Difficulties: Approaches to Teaching and Assessement. Hongkong: Acer Press.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2018-10-02
Published: 2018-10-13
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 242 80